|
PinkButterfly
 |
24th February 2006 - 06:10 pm |
|
I found this on internet, what do you think?
http://progressive.stream.aol.com/aol/us/moviefone/movies/2005/ascannerdarkly_019026/ascannerdarkly_trlr_01_dl.mov
|
| |
Angie
 |
24th February 2006 - 06:28 pm |
|
I just searched it on yahoo too & it's supposed to be coming out July 7th. :D A great movie for any vexel/vector addict..
|
| |
Andrea
 |
24th February 2006 - 06:31 pm |
|
| I believe there has been a topic about this a looong time ago and I still wonder.. how did they do that? :O I can't wait to see it. |
| |
Mattness
 |
24th February 2006 - 08:41 pm |
|
| We are taking over the world :D |
| |
Jenny
 |
24th February 2006 - 08:57 pm |
|
| I can't view it.. what's it supposed to be? :p |
| |
Lillemor
 |
24th February 2006 - 09:06 pm |
|
| Haha, great! :) |
| |
AcidDoll
 |
24th February 2006 - 09:11 pm |
|
|
Quote Jenny
I can't view it.. what's it supposed to be? :p
A movie made with vexels (or at least digital drawings that look like vexels/vectors). I took some screenshot for you:
My daddy read the book. Apparently it's about a weird futuristic society where all the population is being spied, in order to keep the law or something. At least that's what he told me.
I'm so goin to go watch it :D
And yeah, well said Matt !!
|
| |
Nole
 |
25th February 2006 - 03:43 am |
|
| Oh my gosh ive been waiting for Scanner Darkly for so long... i saw the trailer when i saw Crash! i can't believe it's been this long !!!! |
| |
iris_xx
 |
25th February 2006 - 08:20 am |
|
| I reckon this movie looks pretty good. A pretty unique way to present animation xD Even though I think Keanu Reeves is getting a bit lame...=P |
| |
ohsofatalx
 |
09th March 2006 - 03:22 am |
|
| ha cool. maybe the uber talented www.vexels.net members could be makin movies one day.. ima become best friends with them.. you know i wouldnt mind gettin best friend priveleges like 3 houses and a mustang lol |
| |
painfullyuncool
 |
09th March 2006 - 03:37 am |
|
| i think i wanna see that -- if just for the graphics...haha. |
| |
Seven
 |
09th March 2006 - 03:45 am |
|
It's actually called rotoscoping. We were talking about it in my interactive design class:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotoscope |
| |
Linda
 |
09th March 2006 - 04:45 am |
|
I just watched the preview on IMDB. .it looks really great (the graphics i mean) in some parts but most parts looks really weird. I still can't wait to see it though XD
How cool would it be to have a www.vexels.net party and going to see that movie haha. |
| |
artisticdork
 |
09th March 2006 - 04:56 am |
|
| i think this movie might get alot of attention, both positive and negative because i kmnow alot of animators think rotoscoping is cheating, I think if you use it for referencing something its okay, but the way that these guys did it is cheating... its a lazy form of animation... I think in small doses like the td waterhouse commercials its cool, but in a long film it might get annoying.... il probably go see it though, out of sheer curiosity. |
| |
ninjahobbit
 |
09th March 2006 - 11:09 am |
|
So basically, they vectored every single frame of the movie? Gosh, that must take some time x_X
Looks really cool though, I wonder if we'll get it here... |
| |
ohsofatalx
|
09th March 2006 - 11:24 am |
|
| i get tired from even doin a crappy shoppy ugly vexel.. nevermind the whole frame. pssh i'd die X.X |
| |
gunsgobang
 |
09th March 2006 - 02:41 pm |
|
| what's rotoscoping and why's it cheating? |
| |
Andrea
|
09th March 2006 - 03:26 pm |
|
| I don't get the whole rotoscoping thing. :x |
| |
the2slayers
 |
09th March 2006 - 04:10 pm |
|
Artisticdork - how do they view it as cheating? I don't know, I always thought it was highly respected because to do a special effect frame by frame, 24 frames per second, that is really incredible and a lot more tedious than a lot of other techniques. Because I doubt that they did EACH and EVERY frame of that movie. I could be 100% wrong though.
Andrea - think of a flipbook. Where you would draw a picture in a different pose on every page, and then when you flipped it quickly, it would appear as if the character was moving. |
| |
Andrea
|
09th March 2006 - 04:18 pm |
|
| Thenk you Drew. :) I don't get how it's cheating either.. it's kinda like the old-fashioned way of making animations isn't it? |
| |
Seven
|
09th March 2006 - 04:21 pm |
|
| Some think it's cheating because they draw over moving image. So the actors did their thing THEN they animated over it. I guess they consider it cheating like some people consider vexeling cheating. I don't know, I think it's cool. :) |
| |
Andrea
|
09th March 2006 - 04:34 pm |
|
| Ah yes, they don't have to go through the trouble of digitally developing bodies and faces and all that. :P I don't think it's cheating actually. :) |
| |
artisticdork
|
09th March 2006 - 06:24 pm |
|
| its cheating in the sence of full animation like that because as you can see in the trailer... there isnt much actual emphasis on makijng it look solid, the different color layers floating around, the jaggedness, all that. When rotoscoping is used the way it was intewnded, to use as a base... its not cheating. I think I should have made myself a lil more clearer :/ |
| |
| momo.PEACHiE |
14th March 2006 - 05:54 am |
|
Whoa, that looks awesome...is that Keanu Reeves?!
I can't wait to see that. |
| |
Emsickle
 |
20th March 2006 - 12:53 am |
|
Here's the website: http://wip.warnerbros.com/index.html?site=ascannerdarkly...
It looks so awesome! I would love it see it. |
| |
Carina
 |
20th March 2006 - 01:45 pm |
|
| Those vexels are amazing, though. The art is just..wow. |
| |
Reply to thread
|
